My brother said I needed a star tracker for deep sky shots and I thought he was just showing off
For the longest time, I was convinced I could get good shots of galaxies and nebulae just by stacking a bunch of short exposures from my basic tripod. My brother, who's been into this for a decade, kept telling me, 'Noah, you're wasting your time. You need a tracker to follow the stars, even a cheap one.' I finally borrowed his Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer for a weekend at a dark site near Flagstaff. The difference was insane. My old method gave me fuzzy, streaky blobs after 200 shots. With the tracker doing a 3-minute guided exposure, the Orion Nebula just popped with detail I'd never seen in my own photos. He was totally right. It's not about having fancy gear, it's about letting the camera actually collect the light. Anyone have tips for polar alignment without a clear view of Polaris?